Answer: $174000
Explanation:
The firm's budgeted collections for August and the company's budgeted receivables balance on August 31 would be calculated as:
= (30% × $220,000) + (60% × $160,000) + (10% × $120,000)
= (0.3 × $220,000) + (0.6 × $160,000) + (0.1 × $120,000)
= $66000 + $96000 + $12000
= $174000
Answer:
Mass marketing
Explanation:
Mass marketing -
It refers to as the marketing strategy , where the focus is on the complete market rather than some specific group , is referred to as mass marketing .
It is the reverse of niche marketing .
Mass marketing requires advertising method like , television , radio , newspaper , magazine etc.
As they tries to capture large area of consumers .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is mass marketing .
<span>Since real GDP goes up by 1% and price level goes up by 3%, nominal GDP must go up by 3%. This is because real GDP is measured based off a base year's prices, but nominal GDP is not encumbered by such a price basis. Since the price level goes up by 3% (and 3/1 is 3), then nominal GDP goes up by 3% as well since the real GDP level only goes up by 1%.</span>
Answer:
An assembly line is basically just a series of workers who assemble identical items in a line. One of the first uses of the assembly line was in Henry Ford's car factory.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. imposes a small deadweight loss relative to the tax revenue it raises.
Explanation:
By not discouraging the activity, it is understood that taxes should not distort the economic decisions of the individuals subject to taxation. In the theory of Public Finance the inefficiency of taxation can be analyzed through the so-called "excess tax", as a quantification of the loss of utility generated by a distorting tax. The excess of tax arises because the loss of total welfare generated by the tax on the individual with the modification in their behavior, is greater than the mere loss of welfare caused by the decrease in disposable income that comes with the payment of the tax. The value of excess tax that is generated by the substitution effect is greater the higher the tax rate and elasticity (Musgrave, 1986). Therefore, the relationship of exchange between efficiency and equity is not so simple for governments when designing their fiscal policy.
