One could argue that the Lend lease act and other laws like this would increase America's likelihood of war because it resulted in America clearly favoring certain countries involved in the war. Many of the arms and weapons deals occured with countries who were part of the Allies. Even though the US was supposed to be "isolated" it clearly showed America's support of the Allies over the Axis Powers.
If this is about the US, then they often promoted tariffs, as well as specific candidates, such as Harrison and McKinley. The size of their companies also began to be a cause of concern, leading to anti-trust laws, and other legislation, such as the Interstate Commerce Act which was less friendly to business
the answer to your problem is option b
Answer: The history of the Electoral College is receiving a lot of attention. Pieces like this one, which explores “the electoral college and its racist roots,” remind us how deeply race is woven into the very fabric of our government. A deeper examination, however, reveals an important distinction between the political interests of slaveholders and the broader category of the thing we call “race.”
“Race” was indeed a critical factor in the establishment of the Constitution. At the time of the founding, slavery was legal in every state in the Union. People of African descent were as important in building northern cities such as New York as they were in producing the cash crops on which the southern economy depended. So we should make no mistake about the pervasive role of race in the conflicts and compromises that went into the drafting of the Constitution.
Yet, the political conflicts surrounding race at the time of the founding had little to do with debating African-descended peoples’ claim to humanity, let alone equality. It is true that many of the Founders worried about the persistence of slavery in a nation supposedly dedicated to universal human liberty. After all, it was difficult to argue that natural rights justified treason against a king without acknowledging slaves’ even stronger claim to freedom. Thomas Jefferson himself famously worried that in the event of slave rebellion, a just deity would side with the enslaved.
Explanation: