1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
777dan777 [17]
3 years ago
5

What might have happened if mcArthur had convinced Truman to expand the fighting into China? How might today’s world be differen

t?
History
1 answer:
Contact [7]3 years ago
5 0
MacArthur wanted unlimited war and use of bombs on China during the Korean War. 

For the what if, let's try this scenario. MacArthur drops an atomic bomb on China forcing their surrender to the US. The US requires a democratic election and "encourages" the election of a Nationalist hiding out in Taiwan. Nationalists set up a democratic and capitalistic government. They would have tip the balance of powers on the US's side for the Cold War and would have become an industrial powerhouse much sooner. Economic deals would have been created with China in the 1950s instead of the 1970s. More than likely they would have eventually had conflict in the country as communists tried to rise again like has happened in the Middle East to countries we set up in the 1950s and 1960s. 
You might be interested in
which teachings of Judaism most likely helped it appeal to followers?? [;ease give me the right answer fast !!!
jek_recluse [69]
<span>The teachings of Judaism that most likely helped it appeal to followers is that </span>Judaism is a monotheistic religion that provides justice through the law and encourages a belief in the goodness of creation. 

<span>Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    
If </span>you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.

<span> </span>

8 0
4 years ago
During their early histories, ______ sometimes influenced Chinese government, while ______ sometimes influenced Indian governmen
Grace [21]
<span>Confucianism, Buddhism 
would be my best guess... but out of the answers you listed they probably want Daoism and Confucianism. 

Since Shinto is Japanese and Hinduism is Indian... those two are completely out of the question. 
_____ 
</span>Daoism<span> isn't really a government influence... it embraces the philosophy of yin and yang. Good and Bad, without one the other cannot exist. Natural influences of a good and bad government doesn't really make a good governing philosophy. Confucianism was really based on good and virtuous, people live life in harmony and proprietary. He's missing the rules and laws of the Legalist system of government. Where it assumes all people are bad and without laws and rules everything would be in chaos. The First Emperor established the Legalist system in China, he was said to have buried alive hundreds of Confucian scholars and burned Confucian books... His reign was short lived, only 14 years. The next dynasty... the Han, governed with a combination of Legalist and Confucian type of government, lasted 426 years. This pretty much continued till the Tang dynasty when Buddhism a larger influence in society.</span><span />
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jehovah's Witnesses refused to participate in the Nazi party or acts of Nazi loyalty.
dsp73

Answer:

true

Explanation:

the jehovah witnesses refused to paticipate because they did not aggre with the nazi party and what they were doing

5 0
3 years ago
Which best states how ideas from classical philosophy were applied to Renaissance government?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer: Which best states how ideas from classical philosophy were applied to Renaissance government? Ideas from classical philosophy were used to improve the structure and organization of government.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which basic principle that we use today was established by the Magna Carta?
kirill [66]
The basic principle that we use today that was established by the magna Carta was : C. people accused of crime have the right to be represented and defended by another person in court

Basically, Magna Carta create a country where we put Law above the highest ruler. Before the magna Carta, the King could accuse whoever displeased him and sent him to jail without any evidence.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nomadic arabs who moved from place to place on the backs of camels were known as __________.
    15·1 answer
  • Are online rights are limited to free speech and freedom of expression? True or false
    6·1 answer
  • Under Roosevelt, two new laws were passed to protect consumers.
    13·1 answer
  • What are the qualifications for president
    7·1 answer
  • Which idea would most likely be held by a member of the Democratic Party
    9·1 answer
  • !!!!!WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST FOR 100+ WORD RESPONSE !!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Which best describes the difference of opinion over the annexation of Hawaii?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the United States maintain an adequate supply of essential products during World War II?
    9·2 answers
  • Why were the Romans able to expand their control of the Italian peninsula?
    12·2 answers
  • ito ang ginamit na mga ninuno na imbakan ng mga sobrang pagkain at sisidlan sa mga buto ng kanilang mga yamao​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!