Answer:
The correct answer would be C, Yes, it organizes the proposal portion of the amendment process.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you! :)
Answer:
Which type of change—political, social, or economic—had the most impact on Southern life? The economic change on the south was the most impactful on the south because the southerners had to adapt the most due to the change. They also hated people of color and found new ways to show racism. They had to find new ways to work and new ways to go about their daily life.
Which type of change—political, social, or economic—faced the most challenges? Why were Southerners against this type of change? Their most challenging type of change was social. The southerners were affected most by this change as they relied on slaves the most. They needed people to run their farms to make them money. They also didn't like colored people and would have to change how they treated people of color. They still ended up finding ways to be racists by building specific things for a specific race.
For the first hundred years of the United States, only white males were able to vote. Since then, amendments to the Constitution have made it so that any citizen aged 18 or older can vote. Which amendments granted different groups the right to vote? Why were amendments needed to expand voting rights? The amendments 15, 19, 23, 24, and 25 were granted to give any citizens the right to vote. These amendments were needed in order to move on to the next era of the American country. Also white males were very racist against anyone who wasn't white as they believed they deserved all the power because of the color of their skin.
The United Nations shapes global affairs by <span>providing a way for nation-states to discuss global affairs and set goals.
</span>
A democratic republic is strictly speaking a country that is both a republic and a democracy. it is one where ultimately authority and power is derived from the citizens and the government itself is run through elected officials.
Answer:
Unlike democratic constitutions, authoritarian constitutions do not set direct limits on executive authority; however, in some cases such documents may function as ways for elites to protect their own property rights or constrain autocrats' behavior.
