Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer:i never been to one so i really dnt how they meet nd greet
Explanation:
Answer: c. An agreeable message ; increases cheek muscles
Explanation:
When we agree with the message we are most likely to be happy and to smile as the result which will relax our cheeks muscles , one can even see the movement in our cheeks.
However if we don't agree with the message which may be sadning or distressing the muscles that get affected are our forehead and brow area because we are very likely to frown and the muscles in these areas get affected
Not damaged or impaired in any way; complete.
