1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastova [34]
4 years ago
15

Read this excerpt from Nelson Mandela's speech at trial in 1964

History
2 answers:
riadik2000 [5.3K]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. This excerpt relates to Mandela's relationship with FW de Klerk in the 1990s as it argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that Mandela would fulfill in his negotiations with De Klerk to end apartheid.

Explanation:

Before De Klerk came to power, negotiations were blocked for several reasons: De Klerk's predecessor, Pieter Willem Botha, did not want to pass the Rubicon accepting a fully democratic state.

All disagreements revolved, after all, around the recognition of the right to total equality between whites and blacks. Botha raised the possibility of a state of "minorities", in which whites were recognized as "group", which would have earned them specific rights vis-à-vis the rest of the population.

Mandela explained that this vision, in reality, resumed the logic of the Bantustans and that it could cause much more damage to whites than to blacks in a democratic state. It was the best way to perpetuate a sort of reverse apartheid and make whites the scapegoat of the State. On the contrary, the new power should not be of the blacks, but of the majority of the citizens. Botha did not accept.

Negotiations stalled until the arrival of his successor, jurist Frederik de Klerk. Mandela had put on the table several points that he considered imperative to end the apartheid system: a voice equal to one vote; independent and common justice for all; legitimate monopoly of violence for and only for the State (cessation of armed militias); political pluralism based on citizenship and not ethnic groups or confessions; etc. Upon becoming president in 1989, De Klerk accepted all these conditions and released Mandela, because he trusted his word.

His greatness went further: to continue negotiating with the latter, while several military groups, both black and white, had rushed into violent attacks and murders at the most critical moments of the negotiation process. Both leaders insisted on agreeing in the midst of hostility: they knew that peace was more important than their enemies.

Nata [24]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:it argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that Mandela would reject by refusing to negotiate with de Klerk to end apartheid

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In the 1840s, iron ore was discovered in Michigan and Minnesota. However, the largest steelworks were in Pennsylvania, too far a
neonofarm [45]

This was the starting age of railroads and trains, so by this time, they could easily transport ore by train to other places. The booming use of the railroad system quickly made companies that you are talking about rich, which expanded the railroad system even further. New equipment was being invented to get goods and items to their destination in the shortest amount of time possible. The place you are talking about however, is Lake Superior, where there were an abundance of steel ore, but it was very isolated from everything else, so they profited more off of the railroad system than average.

4 0
3 years ago
1. Which option describes a pull factor that influenced European immigration to the united states?
Art [367]
<span>Good Morning!
 
1. It depends a lot on the period. Let us take into account the immigration that occurred in the past centuries, especially in the beginning of immigration to America. At this point, one can indicate the reason for the absence of land, since industrialization in England and in the countries around it, began to dispossess the small landowners. Letter a).
 
2. Nativism is the idea that immigrants must "become Americanized" (in the case of the United States). This idea preaches that the culture of the other is abolished and that the immigrant receives a new cultural charge. It is a materialization of intolerance. Letter D).
 
Hugs!</span>
5 0
3 years ago
By 1990, 85 percent of immigrants who came to the united states came from
natima [27]
The state with the largest number of immigrants is California
6 0
4 years ago
In what year did the American colonist declare their independence from England?
vovangra [49]
On july 4th 1776 we were independent 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Judging from this map approximately what percentage of modern China did acient China occupy
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

25%

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Arawak Indians make a canoe?
    9·1 answer
  • Did the anti-saloon league support speakeasies?<br> a.Yes<br> b.No
    10·1 answer
  • The landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 created the system of “judicial review”, by which the Supreme Court can do which
    7·1 answer
  • 3 tribes occupied regions of the southeast
    12·1 answer
  • What is an example of a right or freedom guaranteed by the Constitution included in the Bill of Rights?
    10·2 answers
  • In New England, counties are mainly judicial districts. True or False
    14·1 answer
  • Discuss the major ideological differences between the USSR and the USA in post war era
    6·1 answer
  • PLZ HELPPP<br> How would a anti federalist (Robert Yates)respond to a federalist
    10·1 answer
  • Por que el gobierno de alfonzo lopez michselsen fue un mandato de transición
    12·1 answer
  • Why was there so much bloodshed in South Asia in the late 1940s, and how did the British government try to contain the violence?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!