1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastova [34]
3 years ago
15

Read this excerpt from Nelson Mandela's speech at trial in 1964

History
2 answers:
riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. This excerpt relates to Mandela's relationship with FW de Klerk in the 1990s as it argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that Mandela would fulfill in his negotiations with De Klerk to end apartheid.

Explanation:

Before De Klerk came to power, negotiations were blocked for several reasons: De Klerk's predecessor, Pieter Willem Botha, did not want to pass the Rubicon accepting a fully democratic state.

All disagreements revolved, after all, around the recognition of the right to total equality between whites and blacks. Botha raised the possibility of a state of "minorities", in which whites were recognized as "group", which would have earned them specific rights vis-à-vis the rest of the population.

Mandela explained that this vision, in reality, resumed the logic of the Bantustans and that it could cause much more damage to whites than to blacks in a democratic state. It was the best way to perpetuate a sort of reverse apartheid and make whites the scapegoat of the State. On the contrary, the new power should not be of the blacks, but of the majority of the citizens. Botha did not accept.

Negotiations stalled until the arrival of his successor, jurist Frederik de Klerk. Mandela had put on the table several points that he considered imperative to end the apartheid system: a voice equal to one vote; independent and common justice for all; legitimate monopoly of violence for and only for the State (cessation of armed militias); political pluralism based on citizenship and not ethnic groups or confessions; etc. Upon becoming president in 1989, De Klerk accepted all these conditions and released Mandela, because he trusted his word.

His greatness went further: to continue negotiating with the latter, while several military groups, both black and white, had rushed into violent attacks and murders at the most critical moments of the negotiation process. Both leaders insisted on agreeing in the midst of hostility: they knew that peace was more important than their enemies.

Nata [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:it argues for the cooperation between politicians of all races that Mandela would reject by refusing to negotiate with de Klerk to end apartheid

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In a surge of European imperialism to protect established interests, expand territory and compete for world influence at the end
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

Africa

Explanation:

The European powers divided almost the entirety of Africa among themselves after the Berlin Conference. Arbitrary borders that ignored Africa's history and ethnicities were drawn, and many of those borders live up to this day, causing conflict in the continent.

3 0
3 years ago
The American President who received the Nobel Peace Prize for his work with Japan and Russia was
Dimas [21]
Theodore Roosevelt received the Nobel Peace prize for his work with japan and Russia.
So correct Option is B.
5 0
3 years ago
Other than the Holocaust, what other hardships have Jewish people experienced in their existence?
Colt1911 [192]

The Jewish people, since they appear in the history seem to have lot of problems with the other people that lived around them, often being persecuted or enslaved.

Initially they have been enslaved by the Egyptians and were not in nice relations with them, saving themselves by the scratch, but ending up in a desert. After they settled in what is now Israel, they have been conquered by the Assyrians, and since they were rebellious, the Assyrians systemically misplaced them out of their homeland. After that came the Romans, and it was similar, as part of them was again moved forcefully in other places of the empire. The Muslim Caliphates showed no mercy toward them, and they were terrorized and forced to move away. Then they had troubles in Europe as well, especially with the Spanish inquisition where they were burned alive publicly or killed without any mercy.

6 0
3 years ago
Which is LEAST important to maintaining a healthy credit score? AMaking on-time payments BChecking your credit report annually C
pogonyaev
C. Knowing your exact credit score
5 0
3 years ago
Two-word term that arises after the death of a powerful leader?
abruzzese [7]

The two word term would be Power vacuum.

Explanation:

A power vacuum is what happens when there is  sudden loss of authority in the governance and there is no potent replacement of it in sight.

This is usually what happens after the death of a long reigning dictator or a strong leader who had held the country so that there was no other alternative ready.

So the stability of their governance leads no potent alternative and makes a power vacuum in the nation.

The power vacuum will be the void of no strong leadership here.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following purposes was the colony of Georgia founded?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the result of the gulf of tonkin incident apex?
    11·2 answers
  • Describe the United Kingdom's parliamentary system of government?
    13·1 answer
  • What do you think most people in the United States think of when they consider the Boston Massacre?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! <br><br> What is Ben Cohen's Entrepreneur Idea?
    14·1 answer
  • How do citizens participate in a representative government
    13·1 answer
  • Why did President Jackson oppose the re-charter of the Bank of the United States?
    6·1 answer
  • The agreement Gerald Ford signed with the leader of the Soviet Union that ended the territorial issues remaining from World War
    9·1 answer
  • What three times did Nixon clashed with congress?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe what the pillars of Islam are and why they're important. Detail at least THREE of the pillars in your response
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!