Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
"<span>Indentured servants were less likely to travel to the Americas" would be the best option from the list, since this greatly increased the demand for slaves who were forced to do the left-over work.</span>
Answer:
im not entirely sure, but it i think it was the slash and burn. (it might not be a system though)
Explanation:
..
I think the answer is D. Because of process of elimination
Answer:
Kings and lords would view this statement as a very aggressive one against their kingdoms if they were not contextualized.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place if the kings and lords who heard this statement didn't have the religious context to understand it, they would feel assaulted or threatened because they would take it literally instead of metaphorical. That is the reason why we have to contextualize our public before we tell share our ideas with them.
