Question

Claim: Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. Counterclaim: There are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. What evidence would most weaken the counterclaim presented here?

Answer 1

I would say that there is no other living thing on earth that can react to medical testing like animals can, for example, testing it on plants wouldn't do us any good. but if you tested it on animals and it changed their hair purple or something then you gained new information that with out testing would have been unknown.

if you have options then I can help more, since it says "would most weaken"

Answer 2

A.Animal research is extremely costly, so it is in the best financial interest of scientists to pursue other means of testing before deciding to utilize animals in their research.

B.With just 115 inspectors and over 7,500 facilities involved with the research, breeding, or handling of animals in some way, regulation of the Animal Welfare Act is virtually impossible.

C.Enacted in 1966, the Animal Welfare Act is a US federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing.

D.People will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures have failed.

its C i just took the test hope this helps