Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
don't know but good luck on getting an answer have a good day
Answer:
World War I altered the world for decades, and writers and poets reflected that shifted outlook in literature, novels and poetry. The horrors of that conflict altered the world for decades – and writers reflected that shifted outlook in their work.
Explanation:
The veto of the Marysville Road and the war against the Bank of the United States led Jackson to assert the supremacy of the national government, despite his desire to reduce the functions of the federal government.
<h3>
Andrew Jackson's beliefs regarding the role of government </h3>
- Expanding political and economic opportunities for the "ordinary man," in his view, would make the United States more democratic than it was at the time.
- He believed that the Northeastern "elite" ruled the government and wanted citizens from all backgrounds, including rural areas, to be able to take office and have a voice as loud as the "elite."
- Jackson advocated for a "white"-based administration and made no mention of the usage of women or people of color in either the government or the general public.
- Jackson wanted to minimize the powers of the federal government, but the Marysville Road veto and the struggle against the Bank of the United States forced him to reaffirm the authority of the national government.
To learn more about Andrew Jackson refer to:
brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ4
