The correct answer is B. The potential for the results to improve the world is not evident.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical perspective ad theory that focuses on increasing the well-being and happiness of individuals while decreasing suffering or pain. Also, for utilitarians, the practical uses and results prevail over other factors. Due to this, utilitarians might argue science is not valuable because a big part of it is understanding how natural phenomenons work, and this might be considered to lack practical uses or to help the world improve. Thus, the reason for a utilitarian to argue against the value of science is that "the potential for the results to improve the world is not evident".
That refers to the authority a higher court has to accept an appeal of a decision that a lower court judge made. That's constantly used when people aren't satisfied with the decision a judge made and try to get a better outcome by appealing.
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
John Hamilton Gray served in the British military before entering Prince Edward Island politics.
Answer:
As stated on AIM's official website, the American Indian Movement's goals were: the recognition of Indian treaties by the United States government, among other goals such as sovereignty and the protection of Native Americans and their liberties.