Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
<u>Answer:</u> An action or decision that later serves as an example is "Precedent"
<u>Explanation:</u>
An earlier incident or action which is considered an indicator or a reference to be used in similar circumstances afterwards is termed as "Precedent". There are two kinds available as persuasive precedents and binding precedents.
A precedent or authority is a legal case in common law legal systems that sets out a principle or rule. The court or other judicial bodies then use this principle or rule when deciding later cases with similar matters or facts.
Answer:rise
Explanation:the blue keeps going up
Governor Winthrop Sargent was removed from office because he had an autocratic style of governing.
<h3>Who is Winthrop Sargent?</h3>
He was the Mississippi's first Territorial Governor who had an autocratic style that clashed with the freedom loving frontiersmen.
Hence, the Governor known as Winthrop Sargent was removed from office because he had an autocratic style of governing.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Winthrop Sargent
<em>brainly.com/question/18075362</em>
#SPJ1
The quote “<em>starving in detail for an ungrateful people who did not care what became of us</em>.” was said by a soldier known as Joseph Plumb Martin from Connecticut who wrote what they felt. The quote means that soldiers were pretty low, morals were terrible, rations were poor, and soldiers went unpaid. They also Lost their property most of the time which meant a loss of their rights.
