The correct answer is: <em>"Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review."</em>
According to the rules published by the IRB regarding the applicability of the Expedited Review, this extends to all individuals, regardless of their age. This condition will not change unless the research involves activities or circumstances that increase the level of risk to human subjects to a level higher than minimal.
<span>If you are part of the government, all phishing attempts need to be taken very seriously and handled with the utmost of urgency. These attacks can disable large numbers of systems and lead to the misuse of large amounts of very sensitive data, and forwarding these attacks on to the next point of contact can make sure that they are handled properly.</span>
Answer:C)valid
Explanation:
A valid argument is an argument whose conclusions can be traced or related to the premise of such an argument.
Any argument whose conclusions can be linked up with the initial assumptions made by the premise if invalid.
The action of the college administrator of trying to assess whether an admissions test accurately predicts how well applicants will perform at his school the College administrator is concerned whether there is a valid Relationship.