Answer:
a. Raw material discounts
b. Reduction of unit cost
c. Specialists
d. Better production methods
Explanation:
a. Corporations have various advantages over small businesses. Because they buy raw materials in bulk they are able to negotiate volume discount. This gives them more advantage over the small business who cannot buy in bulk.
b. A fall out from the above is reduction of unit cost or average cost, when discount is received it reduces the total cost of material and by implication the unit cost.
c. Because of their size and financial strength, corporation is able to attract qualified employees as opposed to small businesses that are limited by their financial position.
d. Corporations because of their financial strength are able to finance research with view to discovering a better production methods. This may be impossible to small businesses.
The answer in the statement above is true. It is because the shopping ads that they provide has the ability of having to provide the text ads in the same time in which is beneficial towards its shoppers because not only they will know about the product but they find the best match for the product that they would like to purchase.
Answer:
The answer is $330,000
Explanation:
Cash paid to suppliers is the total amount of cash paid to its creditors.
We can find that through:
Cost of sold
Minus: Decrease in inventory
Plus: Decrease in accounts payable
=Cash paid to suppliers.
Now let's start:
Cost of sold - $450,000
Decrease in inventory - $160,000
Decrease in accounts payable- $40,000
$450,000 - $160,000 + $40,000
=$330,000
Therefore, Cash paid to suppliers is $330,000
The similarity of negative growth rate and zero growth rate is that there is no growth towards a positive output. For example, if the business is currently in either state, it is not earning. It may be very stagnant (for zero growth rate) or losing (for negative growth rate). Which either the case may be, it is not beneficial to the business owner.
Answer:
b. both firms will reduce their price.
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant
So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price
hence the option b is correct
