Answer:
The best answer is "D"
Explanation:
Jessica will not prevail in her product liability suit under a theory of misrepresentation.
The key to recovery on the basis of misrepresentation is the plaintiff's ability to prove that he relied upon the representations that were made and for Jessica she is a little more the 200 pound mark.
Answer:
They weaken their ability to represent the interests of employees
Explanation:
The two organizations American Federation of Labor(AFL) and Congress of Industrial organizations(CIO) work differently regarding their approach to representing labor or employees. They have had disagreements in the past, from CIO breaking out of AFL to some violent exchanges and differing policies to representing labour. These differences make it less effective to represent employees as these unions are not entirely unified.
Answer:
Consumer surplus increases by $2
Explanation:
The consumer surplus can be defined as the benefit that consumers gain when they pay less for a good that they are willing to pay more for.
a). Determine the final demand as follows;
Price elasticity of demand=% change in price/% change in demand
where;
price elasticity of demand=-1
% change in price={(Final price-initial price)/initial price}×100
Final price=$24
initial price=$25
% change in price=(24-25)/25=(1/25)×100=-4%
% change in demand=x
replacing in the original expression;
-1=-4/x
x=4%
% change in quantity={final quantity-initial quantity/initial quantity}×100
let final quantity=y
4%={(y-100)/100}×100
0.04=(y-100)/100
4=y-100
y=4+100=104
final quantity=104 units
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×change in price×change in quantity
where;
change in price=25-24=1
change in quantity=104-100=4
Consumer surplus=(1/2)×1×4=2
Consumer surplus increases by $2
<span>The marginal propensity to consume is a metric
that quantifies the concept of increase in consumption with an increase in
income. Mathematically MPC is defined as:</span>
MPC = Change in consumption / Change in income
Purchase of goods and services is considered as
consumption, therefore:
Change in consumption = $16 billion
In the government’s perspective, taxes are
considered as income, therefore the problem ask us to find for the necessary change
in tax collection to maintain equilibrium GDP. Substituting the values in the
formula:
0.80 = $16 billion / Change in income
Change in income = $20 billion
<span>Therefore the government should increase the tax collection by $20
billion.</span>
