Answer:
I have uploaded the picture with the relevant information below.
Explanation:
We can see in this picture that the market equilibrium is met at a price of $5, thus, $5 is the equilibrium price, because demand and supply are both 125 at this point.
If the govenment sets a price floor of $2, there will be no effect, because the price floor is non-binding.
A non-binding price floor is a minimum price set by the government that is actually lower that the equilibrium market price. In this case, the price of the market will be allowed to go to $5, and reach equilibrium, so the policy osf setting the $2 price floor will have no effect.
Answer: Fractional reserve banking
Explanation:
Fractional-reserve banking is a common form of banking that is practised by commercial banks worldwide. It involves banks in every part of the world. Fractional reserve banking is the acceptance of deposits from customers and then making loans to borrowers, while the reserve a fraction of the deposit liabilities of the bank is held.
From the question, Maria makes a deposit of $10,000 into the savings account she uses at Smalltown Bank and the bank holds 20% of the deposit she made and later lends the remaining $8,000 to another customer is an example of fractional reserve banking.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
Here, in the solution the tax effects are ignored as tax rate is not provided.
Since accrual basis is the acceptable basis, we have:
All the revenues and expenses are to be recognised in the period it belongs to, and not when the actual cash payment is received or made.
Total revenue earned in 2015 = $400,000
Total expense (Wages of employees) for 2015 = $200,000
Therefore, net income for 2015 = $400,000 - $200,000 = $200,000
Note: It is of no relevance that when actual cash was realised from debtors and when actual payment was made to employees.
Answer:
The answer is: Modified rebuy
Explanation:
A modified rebuy happens when a company (or an individual consumer) will buy a product or service which it has already purchased in the past. But now the company wants to change either the supplier, the product's specifications (e.g. gel seats) or the terms of the sale.
I would say that for most people, buying an apartment or a house would be the most major thing they could do that would affect their net worth. Initially it would be mostly a liability at first but as it appreciates, especially if it is in a big city where the population keeps growing then it most likely will appreciate and then the owner's assets will increase since their equity will increase.
