True, when analyzing data measured by a continuous quantitative variable, the statistical tests of estimation and contrast frequently used are based on supposing that a random sample has been obtained from a probability distribution of normal type, but in many cases this assumption is not valid, in these cases we have two possible mechanisms: The data can be transformed in such a way that they follow a normal distribution or you can resort to parametric or non-parametric tests.
The only similar thing that i found is that suffrage age is 18 in both places
Answer:
Yes he may prevail
Explanation:
He wants to exercise his civic duty and he has every right to file a suit because he has been taxes indirectly to the city.
Firstly, The farmer does not pay any tax directly to the city because a portion of his farm property is turned over by the county to the city to support the city police department, which indirectly, he is paying tax because this support to the city is categorized indirectly as his tax.
Secondly, His farm property has been vandalized several times over the months and the police didn't do anything about it to improve his situation which calls for attention to why nothing has been done about it despite his support to the city police department.
With the two above paragraphs, he has a point and his also lives in one of the rural communities and the city ordinance provides that only residents of the city may vote, but the city ordinance is always the city ordinance, the law might and might not favor him, he could get payment for the damages on his properties, but it would be quite difficult for him to prevail over the suit because he doesn't live in the city
The correct answer is letter D
Critical thinking consists of analyzing and evaluating the consistency of reasoning, especially the statements that society considers to be true in the context of everyday life.
This evaluation can be carried out through observation, experience, reasoning or the scientific method. Critical thinking requires clarity, precision, fairness and evidence, since it aims to avoid particular impressions. In this sense, it is related to skepticism and the detection of fallacies.
