What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? It might be used later to limit
rights that weren’t originally listed. It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms. It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power. It might be used later to free enslaved people in the west.
The answer to your question would be "It might be used later to limit the rights that weren't originally listed" or the first one. Hope this helped you answer your question.
