1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
14

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? It might be used later to limit

rights that weren’t originally listed. It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms. It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power. It might be used later to free enslaved people in the west.
History
2 answers:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
8 0

It might be used later to limit rights that weren’t originally listed.


Allushta [10]3 years ago
7 0
The answer to your question would be "It might be used later to limit the rights that weren't originally listed" or the first one. Hope this helped you answer your question.
You might be interested in
What year did the U.S. join the great war?
kotegsom [21]
On April 6 , 1917 , the Us joined its Allies to fight in World War I.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Treaty of Versailles Synthesis:
Bas_tet [7]

Treaty of Versailles carved out disproportionate shares of land between the winners.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to end the war and be on the terms that it does not make another contest arise between the powers of Europe.

However, the winners of the war carved out a huge share of the land between themselves and Russia and effectively ended the empire of Austro Hungary.

Germany also got the short end of the stick and Italy did not negotiate its position well.

This left the countries dissatisfied and germinated the seeds of another conflict that led to the second world war.

3 0
3 years ago
What would result from the growth of a city?
Naily [24]
Well a number of things but most likely, the resources would go down but probably not by much. I hope this as helped :D
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is something said by or about the Regulators of South Carolina?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

The Regulators were backcountry settlers who banded together in 1767 in response to a wave of crime that swept their region in the aftermath of a disruptive war with the Cherokee Indians (1759–1761). Bandit gangs, including women as well as escaped slaves, roamed the country with little fear of capture.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help me answer these questions
liberstina [14]

Answer: he did to much

Explanation: he was a bad chilid

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the streams on either side of the Great Divide?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following distinguishes Theravadan from Mahayanan Buddhism?
    7·1 answer
  • Austin Dabney was the only African American granted land by the state of Georgia in the 18th century because he Question 2 optio
    6·1 answer
  • The common goals of nineteenth-century women and Americans who were pursuing reform
    8·2 answers
  • How did progressive reforms protect women in the workplace
    12·2 answers
  • How did hitler take over Germany
    12·1 answer
  • How did Constantinople's location help it become a great trading center​
    14·2 answers
  • How did technology help Chinese society become a prosperous and advanced society? List three major types of thechnology or infra
    5·1 answer
  • Why did they play a role against the violation of human rights​
    8·1 answer
  • Economics & History What were some of the positive and negative effects of the Columbian Exchange?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!