1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
3 years ago
11

HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

History
2 answers:
solong [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

If the 20th century globalization didn’t occur and there was no phones no electronic, no cargo ships in our country the developed U.S. Then economically our country would be much slower, more hard labor, and more patient.

   Firstly, If the 20th century globalization didn't happen and no one would have phone, computers, etc...then no one would have instant gratification. If someone wanted to talk to someone that is long distance then they would have to send a letter which would probably take a little while since everyone else would be sending letters as well to be able to talk to other people. Also, people would have to talk to people face to face as well not texting them on their phone and be more social. Also, communications would be way slower and harder to communicate to each other. So that would result in more patient people because it would take longer to talk to people and it wouldn’t be instant gratification like it is today with electronics.  

   Then, If there was no massive cargo ships not as much products or produce from other countries would be brought to the country. That would mean not as much produce and food then the developed country, the U.S. would have to grow and raise more produce like fruits, vegetables, and cows, and chickens. Also, people wouldn’t eat as much because of less produce. There would also be more farmers to help supply the produce for the population. Which more jobs would be hard working instead of today where most jobs are sitting job and your on an electronic like a computer all day long. Instead of an office job more people would be outside and doing more hard labor.

In conclusion, If the 20th century globalization didn’t happen more people would still be working more hard labor and there would be more farmers. If we didn’t have massive cargo ships their wouldn’t be as much food and goods. Then if there was no electronics people would have to be more patient and communications would be much slower. Overall, the developed country of the U.S. would be very different if globalization did happen and would be the country it is today.

jok3333 [9.3K]3 years ago
3 0
I think is yes because if they never occurred than no one would discovered or have those things they will have to try to make them by themselves
You might be interested in
Why did people eventually leave the fertile crescent?
True [87]

Answer:no clue

Explanation:I'm not smart!

3 0
3 years ago
Roper v. Simmons deals with
frozen [14]
Was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the U.S. held that is info uncostitilutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18.
6 0
3 years ago
Plzz help!!!
Pavlova-9 [17]
The significance of the legend of Sundiata to Mali's history is A) Sundiata's determination to overcome his handicap and become a great leader inspired others. Sundiata was made fun of constantly because of him being crippled, however he learned to walk, which impressed the whole community. After living in exile, he heard the Malian kingdom was in danger and brought an army with him to defeat the enemy. He then became the emperor of the first Malian Empire.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Theodore Roosevelt was very interested in the conservation movement that had evolved during the late 1800s. Which of t
V125BC [204]
<span>President Theodore Roosevelt was very interested in the conservation movement that had evolved during the late 1800s. So</span> Theodore Roosevelt has exapnded the national park system and supported the government policies that managed natural resources. I hope that this helps.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the conflicts between Native Americans and white settlers? A.)Reservations enabled Native Americans and w
levacccp [35]
<span>The question is asking us "What was one effect of the conflicts between Native Americans and white settlers?" and we have three options to choose from. the correct option is C.)Over time, Native Americans lost the ability to effectively resist white settlement." We can see this for example in the fact that there are almost no native Americans today in the US, and most of them are assimilated and virtually none live in the livestyle they had before the settlers came - so they did not manage to resist the while settlement</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which branch of the US Government consists of judges and a system of courts?
    5·2 answers
  • Northern and southern states compromised on the slave trade by
    15·1 answer
  • Where and When did the British slave trade begin in the new world?
    15·1 answer
  • A difference between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke
    6·1 answer
  • What policy did the United States decide to use to combat the spread of Communism?
    12·1 answer
  • What did the outcome of the 1948 presidential election reveal?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did some early members of the women's rights movement in the United States argue against pursuing women's suffrage
    11·1 answer
  • Why was it important for the Americans to win the support of France during the Revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • Please Help me!???????​
    14·2 answers
  • Many enlightenment thinkers were writing their views on government in
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!