Establishing the Constitution required the ascent of states which would make it a Federal Act.
Federalism involves:
- A single nation having two types of governments with one being regional, and the other being general
- Regional governments being consulted when constitutions need to be amended
When the U.S. Constitution needed to be established and amended, it required the consent of the various states in the United States. This makes it a federal action because it involved the various states.
In conclusion, the establishment of the U.S. Consitution was a federal act because it involved the input and consent of the regional state governments.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/985210.</em>
Answer: The ancient Egyptian civilization grew for thousands of years intact because the Nile River Valley and Mediterranean and Red Sea border kept foreigners and their ideas away. The Nile River was very important to Egyptian civilization. The Nile provided a communication and trade route across a huge and harsh land
Explanation:
Answer:
build wealth for themselves.
Explanation:
Black South Africans suffered under apartheid for most of the 20th century, a system of strict racial segregation enforced by the government. One of South Africa's most murky unresolved problems is of land reform. A latest government survey revealed that 70 percent of the land is held by white farmers. Resentment over that basic inequity is the reason that led to land confrontations such as the recent takeover of Stefan Smit's Stellenbosch farm. Black South Africans were desperately want to build some wealth for them.
Answer:
To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.
The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]
Explanation:
No it was Thomas Jefferson that wrote the declaration of independence and the draft so your answer would be false
