That no one country could have a sphere of influence to trade in China- so the U.S. would have equal access to trade.
B makes the most sense because they made hardly any money at all so ya it's B.
Can I please have Brainliest? :3
<span>Good Morning!
In a market society, also known as "capitalism," the roles are very clear. Consumers have the role of effecting the consumption of products or services, thus acting as a thermometer for the market since it is from the tastes and options of the population that the market must be guided. The market, then, is the one that meets the demand and produces in order to raise customers and realize sales. The government is a manager, but should not interfere much with the functioning of the market. The government must manage and prevent unfair competition, harness currency strength and international competition.
Hugs!</span>
China and Japan share various cultural ideas with each
other. With their geographical proximity, they have continued to influence one
another. However, despite their similarities, there are also ways which these
two nations differ, and that is their view of the white man from the west.
Both China and Japan confronted challenges from Western
imperial powers and ended up signing unequal treaties with the West. However,
one stark difference in their reaction to these unequal treaties. The Japanese government,
currently under the Meiji regime chose to develop themselves through Westernization
in Japan. The Qing government, on the other hand, decided to keep the
traditional Chinese values and institutions in China. China’s efforts at
reforms were focused on dealing with the traditional methods to the growing western
influence in the country. Chinese cultural pride was profoundly ingrained in
their mindset that it turned into an impediment. It blinded numerous Chinese,
stopping them from identifying the requirement for fundamental change and to assimilate
new information from the west. Unlike China, Japanese efforts then was to
understand and recreate foreign technology to meet their military and
industrial requirements. These endeavors proved to be successful. The Meiji
then saw that military technology and industrialization could not be removed
from institutional structures that created these developments in the West. They
displayed minor hesitation in altering or ending traditional institutions for
those that could give Japan the modernity it needed to prosper as nation.
In conclusion, the Meiji Restoration was the Japanese’
success in assimilating western idea to their traditional way of things.
Proving that opening themselves for criticisms and help from western power
could be used to empower themselves.
That would be Bourgeoisie