Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
As Americans, it is our manifest destiny to take and improve the land all the way to the ocean.
Let's start with understanding the term: human trafficking means trade in humans often for the purpose of sexual exploitation or, forced labor. In 2005 global annual profit from human trafficking was estimated for $31.6bn.
I believe that human trafficking is so difficult to stop mostly because of its profitability for traffickers, brothel owners, madams etc. Another factor is social alienation and stigmatisation of victims by society. Governments often do not offer enough support for trafficked victims. Finally, the victims are under huge psychological pressure which is often hard to handle and leads to consequences like learned helplessness or Stockholm syndrome.
The Soviet Union had a command economy. So, option (c) is the correct answer.
<h3>Why did the Soviet Union consider to have a great command of the economy?</h3>
A command economy is one in which the central government has a considerable role in determining a country's resource availability and distribution.
In this scenario, the Soviet Union operated a command economy structure from the early twentieth century until the 1990s.
The government can use this command economy to tell businesses what things to create, how to allocate resources to residents, and so on.
Citizens' economic freedom is limited under this system since they have little control over the things they buy.
For more information on the economic command, refer below
brainly.com/question/32705
Answer:
compares:
they both lived in america around some point
they are both human
and they both did trade with each other
the contrast is that we had guns. they had bows. they also had a different skin color. and native americans as far as my knowledge goes where always in america while europeans came from europe. we also took them as slaves. not the other way around
