They would give harsh punishments so the society dosnt do the wrongdoing
In response to Fascist aggression in the 1930s, Great Britain and France followed a policy of <span>Appeasement.</span>
Answer:
Your Majesty, Your Royal Highness, Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen: I accept the Nobel Prize for Peace at a moment when 22 million Negroes of the United States of America are engaged in a creative battle to end the long night of racial injustice
Explanation:
use this but change it up add your own words make it more of you u dont want to sound to professional. good luck!
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Marx and Engels believe and criticize that the existing social system causes the creation of paid wage laborers that have low pay and unfair long hours. These laborers work to fulfill society’s demands from more and more products which eventually will give more and more money for just a few people.
They also criticize that all relationships in family life are focused around gaining more and more money, which eventually also reduces sentimental values in the home.
