1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shtirl [24]
3 years ago
11

Which agreement solved the disagreement over whether slaves should be counted for the purposes of representation?

History
1 answer:
Anna35 [415]3 years ago
8 0
This agreement was known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which was reached between southern and northern delegates, and in which slaves counted as 3/5 of a single person.
You might be interested in
Which Spanish missionary accompanied conquistadors in their conquest of 1 point
Tresset [83]
Hernán Cortés. I hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The system of checks and balances allows the president to​
Mice21 [21]

Answer:

The president's power is limited by a system of checks and balances written into the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

( it might be wrong pls dont report me just let me kno y its wrong )

8 0
3 years ago
Jesus and God love you!<br> if your sad just know that God is there for you
scoundrel [369]
Thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the establishment clause and the free-exercise clause?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

A) The establishment clause stops the government from favoring a religion while the free exercise clause allows people to express their religion.

Explanation:

Establishment clause prohibits the government from "endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities." The Free exercise clause protects religious beliefs and allows people to practice and share.

Evidence: https://home.ubalt.edu/shapiro/rights_course/Chapter5text.htm#:~:text=The%20free%20exercise%20clause%20protects,in%20religion%20and%20religious%20activities.

3 0
2 years ago
The supreme court's landmark decision in _____ dramatically increased the flow of money from interest groups, 527s, and super pa
REY [17]
<span>Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (2010). The 5-4 decision that ensued ruled against laws prohibiting unions and corporations from using their general treasury funds on political advertisements. The rationale behind this decision is that it was a fundamental violation of the First Amendment's right to free speech, which of course allows for the right for individuals to express their views, opinions, and support of various causes without fear of retribution from the government. The decision was highly controversial and has unquestionably increased both the scope and influence of superPACS and special interest groups.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main goal of the Kim crow laws passed in the south after the end of reconstruction
    13·1 answer
  • What happened during Kristallnacht in November 1938? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • The constitution was shaped by European traditions, particularly what??
    7·1 answer
  • John Locke a great thinker of the enlightenment would be most likely to support
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these will cause the currency
    6·2 answers
  • (**30 POINTS**)what do you think was the LAtin AMerican reaction to increasing US power in the early 1900s?
    7·2 answers
  • Which generals wife provided food and comfort during the winter war at valley forge
    5·1 answer
  • In her article, the author intends to show that future funding of an ELT program in Andover is uncertain. Explain how the text s
    10·2 answers
  • What are the Upanishads?
    10·2 answers
  • Great Britian responded to colonial protests against its policies by
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!