Answer:
d. To study logic it is important to learn to employ language precisely
Explanation:
Our ability to communicate and be able to express what we have in mind through words is something that has characterized us as living beings.
Being able to schematize our ideas from a linguistic basis is one of the foundations of logic. The language we use carries with it the meaning of our reality, without this part there would be nothing for us.
On the practical level, if a person must speak or think in a language other than the native one, logic and mental flow simply feel natural for that particular language.
Each language has a particular way of categorizing mental concepts. There are data that correlate the learning of multiple languages with the stretching of the plasticity of our brain.
Our conceptual understanding is, at best, tenuous with respect to the logic of language. The circumstantial evidence points to a schematism in human language that is highly restricted, but also very rich and easy.
It would be transitive. A transitive has a direct object, something that it the verb is acting on. The verb is belive. The direct object is what it's acting on, so, what is he believing? In music. He is believing on the music, so since it has a direct object, it's transitive.
It would be intransitive if it didn't have a direct object:
<em>I believe.
</em><em>He believed.
</em><em />
But as soon as you add any kind of direct object it's transitive:
<em>I believed him.
</em><em>He believed the dog.</em>
The central idea of that topic is the fact that there is a maturity factor of driving. As a driver myself you can tell who has been driving for a a decent amount of time and who is a new driver. So in conclusion it is just the fact of maturity
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
<em>Proving</em> a claim is what evidence does.
