Answer:
(a) 0; 0
(b) $150 per hour; $16.67 per hour
(c) (b) $150 per hour; $53.57 per hour
Explanation:
(a) Number of hours = 125
Marginal cost = 0 (since service is cost less upto 200 hours)
Average cost = 0
(b) Number of hours = 225
Marginal cost = $150 per hour
Total cost = $150 × (225 - 200)
= $150 × 25
= $3,750
Average cost = Total cost ÷ Number of hours
= $3,750 ÷ 225
= $16.67 per hour
(c) Number of hours = 325
Marginal cost = $150 per hour
Total cost = $150 × (325 - 200)
= $150 × 125
= $18,750
Average cost = Total cost ÷ Number of hours
= $18,750 ÷ 325
= $53.57 per hour
Answer:
It improves employee retention and performance motivation.
Explanation:
There are few factors that keep employee motivated and loyal toward organization. The basic factors are career path and monetary benefits that keep the energy flow in the employee.
A formal succession plan is a human resource management strategy for identifying the potential successor, it reduces the confusion for the organization and employee in the method of hiring and promotion. These strategies also keep an employee motivated, improve performance and retention in the organization as they find growth and security in the organization.
Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
Answer:
$13,000
Explanation:
The computation of the december 31 liability for the warranty is shown below:
Given that
Warranty expense = 5% of sales
Warranty payable = $13,000
Paid amount = $5,000
Sales = $120,000
based on the above information
The warranty liability as on Dec 31 would be equivalent to the warranty payable i.e. $13,000
The same is to be considered
Answer:
pattern: mulitplied by -2
conjecture for next number: -80
Explanation:
for each number, it gets multiplied by -2.
two negatives make a positive.
:)
