Answer:a.Naturalist
Explanation:
A naturalist believes that subjects or participants are able to show their original behavior if they are in their natural environment. A researcher would be more likely to get a true presentation of the participants behaviour if they observe them in their natural environment, if they are not aware that they are under observation. People act normal in normal situations but may alter their behaviour in situations when they know they are being watched.
A naturalist will carry those experiments or research that can't not be done in a lab such as this one of observing women in a shelter.
Answer:
The team is experiencing "Groupthink"
Explanation:
Groupthink occurs when a group of individuals reaches a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or alternatives.
Groupthink is based on a common desire not to upset the balance of a group of people. This desire creates a dynamic within a group whereby creativity and individuality tend to be stifled in order to avoid conflict.
Groupthink is not always problematic. In the best cases, it allows a group to make decisions, complete tasks, and finish projects quickly and efficiently. In the worst cases, it leads to poor decision-making and inefficient problem-solving.
One advantage of the interview method of personality assessment is the "<span>ability to pose open-ended questions".
</span>
In an interview the person under appraisal must be given impressive scope in "recounting his story." Interviews have both verbal and nonverbal (e.g., gestural) segments. The point of the meeting is to accumulate data, and the sufficiency of the information assembled depends in extensive part on the inquiries asked by the questioner.
