170696 is the answer fellow user
The answer would be 14/15
Find a common denominator that both of the fractions can use. An easy way to do this is simply multiply the denominators together. So for 3/5 you would multiply by 3 to get the fraction 9/15 and then multiply 1/3 by 5 to get 5/15. Add both 9/15 and 5/15 to then get 14/15.
We are given statement : 3 more than a number then divided the result by 8.
We need to write an algebraic expression for it.
Let us assume unknown number be n.
3 more than n = (n+3).
Now, we need to divide that result (n+3) by 8.
So, we would get (n+3) divided by 8 =
.
<h3>Therefore, final expression is

</h3>
1. Answer;
- Triangle
Explanation;
The cross section formed by a plane that contains a vertical line of symmetry for a tetrahedron is a Triangle.
A tetrahedron also a triangular pyramid, is a polyhedron composed of four triangular faces, six straight edges, and four vertex corners.
2. Answers
- Triangle
Explanation;
The cross section formed by a plane that intersects three faces of a cube is a Triangle. A cross section is the shape we get when cutting straight through an object. The shape of the cross-section of a solid depends upon the orientation of the cutting plane to the solid.
Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the sample mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean is equal to 31.3 MPG, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation, the statistic is given by
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG