Answer:
B
Explanation:
Insurance verification cannot be performed until the patient arrives for services
Answer:
Explanation:
NOTE: In order to solve this question efficiently, there is need to watch the videos attached to this question. Kindly check video link in the comment section of this question since it can not be attached here. If the link can not be added in the comment section, check the Channel(TED), the title is AM I NOT HUMAN? A CALL FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM.
So, from the video one can see that the presenter in the TED talk made use of Pathos more than he does for logos.
The argument/point in this presentation that I find the most compelling is when he argued that people that have bad past also deserves an empathy and not only people with no criminal record as we are all human and we can do better. The past is in the past and the present is the present.
Answer:
(29,800)
Explanation:
The computation of the financial advantage or disadvantage is shown below:
As we know that
Financial disadvantage = Cost of making - Cost of buying
where,
Cost of making is
= [(Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit) × units produced] + additional segment margin
= [($4.7 + $9.30 + $9.80 + $5.20) × 22,000 units] + $34,000
= ($29 × 22,000 units ) + $34,000
= $672,000
And, the Cost of buying is
= Units produced × offered price
= 22,000 units × $31.90
= $701,800
So,
Financial disadvantage is
= Cost of making - Cost of buying
= $672,000 - $701,800
= (29,800)
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws