Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
He is known for being the founder and architect of the American financial system.
I would say D, but I'm unfamiliar with Islamist's and their ideologies.
The correct answer should be <span>B. Is there a chance this job might not work out?
This is a risk related question because it is a part of risk assessment. When asking such questions, you usually analyze the possible situation and the outcome in order to prevent bad things from happening. People ask this question when they decide on whether the business endeavor is a risk that they're willing to take or not. The other questions are important as well but are not as much related to risk assessment.</span>
Rural Americans were much more self-sufficient than Urban Americans. They had farms or often went hunting or similar things and didn't rely that much on money and getting manufactured goods or store-bought food. Urban Americans however had other opportunities such as higher chance of chasing their careers or educating themselves or participating in daily life and political events and similar things.
