Answer:
A person in a communal relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>non contingent </em>effect of helping. While a person in an exchange relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>contingent</em> effect of helping others.
Explanation:
<em>Communal relationships</em> are closely knitted relationships, such that occurs within family and partners. In a communal relationship, helping does not come with future expected benefits (non contingent) . Giving is done with an objective of ensuring the other person's need is met.
In an <em>Exchange relationship</em>, the effect of helping comes with future benefits of repayments. Giving is done with an objective of some future repayment. This type of relationship occurs among business partners. 'If person A does person B a favor today, it is expected that person B will repay the favor to person A in future.
<span>According to Gordon Allport, intergroup contact is likely to reduce prejudice when group members engage in competitive tasks. This theory makes sense, when people have to compete for something in their home life or work life, they tend to think of things being more fair when there is a competition held to achieve the winning. There is so many prejudice in the work environment now-a-days that it is hard to have employees understand why decisions are rightfully made. </span>
The people who commonly supported federalists include factory workers, merchants, and property owners. This is because they sold things, and federalists helped with the market. Those who supported the republicans were northern farmers, southern planters and artisans. This is because they produced things and republicans supported the production of goods.
The body of water that separates Hawaii from Maui is called t<span>he Alenuihaha Channel.</span>
Answer:
8 electrons
it wants me to explain but there isnt much to explain apart from a picture that i dont have
