Answer:
A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, etc. based on strong evidence.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
I believe the answer is The bank secrecy Act.
Prior to this act, the government cannot (under any circumstances) force banks to Record information about any transactions made by certain organizations/individuals.
This act force the banks to made the record if the amount surpasses $10,000 in order to prevent money laundering.
In case anyone else needs help with this problem....
It is true of the South Carolina Constitution of 1895 that most African Americans were no longer able to vote.
Depending on the country referred, some would not recommended during days that are prone to accident. However, this rule may not be entirely true. Student's can still practice. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
