Increasing numbers of people no longer view the safety of their neighbor- hoods as the sole responsibility of the police. Throughout the world, citizens in areas plagued by crime and violence are uniting to work with local gov- ernment. Together, they have the knowledge and resources to identify and remove the sources of crime, drug use, and juvenile delinquency in their communities.
Developing and sustaining these partnerships requires strong local leadership from mayors, city managers, city planners, and other elected local officials. This monograph was prepared to help create that leadership by chronicling how local public officials have used community safety partnerships to build healthier communities.
A framework for using community-local government partnerships to reduce crime now exists based on the experiences of public officials in North America, Europe, Africa, and Australasia. This framework includes the following:
• Recognizing crime and safety as a quality-of-life issue.
• Working across jurisdictional boundaries.
• Recognizing the crucial role of political leadership.
• Developing tools and measures of success that involve the community and victims of crime.
The programs examined in this monograph illustrate that this framework works best when adapted to the specific needs of a community. Good gover- nance requires that mayors and other key local officials develop the capaci-
Answer:
All accused have the right to a lawyer.
Explanation: test
Answer:
I feel proud of Mt. Everest because it is the tallest mountain in the world and it is situates in Nepal. I am also feel proud of Gautam Buddha because Siddhartha Gautam born in Brahman family in Hindu religion but has sacrificed this luxurious life for the sake of humanity and noble cause.
Answer:
d. Rational, technical expertise rather than emotional ideology or public participation.
Explanation:
In the philosophy of bureaucratic authoritarianism, the head of the state is governed by the top bureaucrats.
Under bureaucratic authoritarianism, the military bureaucracy as well as the state bureaucracy comes together and they believe that the problems prevailing in the country can be solved consulting and communicating with the rational people and the technical experts of the society.
The State should not follow the emotional ideology to solve the problems which may led to uncertain consequences. Also taking help of the public participation to solve may arises many differences to the solution as many people will give varying solutions to the problems. The best way suited is to take the help of the technical experts and the rational people.
Thus the answer is
d. Rational, technical expertise rather than emotional ideology or public participation.
