Well, I can say that it hasn't straightly increased or decreased constantly. it has been kind of a bumpy ride in a way. They started off okay but when the WWI began economic problems led in with time. Later on came the great depression which was really bad.. And from then, of course, continued to get worse. Later it got better and so on. Back and forth until now. All because of taxes increase and decrease show the stability of us economy
Question Options:
A) cause of action for breach of implied covenant of good faith.
B) retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
C) legitimate claim under bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ).
D) disparate impact employment discrimination.
Answer: retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
A retaliation claim involves an act whereby an employer treats an employee adversely when an employee alleges about any wrong, harassment or discrmination.
James was involved in whistleblowing which is the act whereby an individual passes information about a wrongdoing in an organisation. Based on this whistleblowing (reporting that particular batch of widgets did not meet the exacting requirements of the U.S) his boss demoted him( retaliation). Hence, James has a claim for retaliation.
There language and religon
Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.
