Human rights groups in the 20th century worked to ensure that people around the world were protected from brutal treatment.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Human rights have become a sign part of political correspondence during the second 50% of the twentieth century. This was an integral part of the expanding juridification of global relations in the wake of the 2nd World War and of the new clashes emerging out of it.
From that point forward countless entertainers have embraced the language of human rights for various thought processes, utilizing it in quest for their separate advantages.
Following the two superpowers and their partners, the counter provincial freedom developments perceived the potential offered by the dialog over human rights.
Since the 1960's and 1970's, new on-screen characters and new types of human rights activism have showed up gratitude to the developing significance of common society exercises. Meanwhile, various administrative, semi-legislative and non-legislative associations are attempting to reinforce human rights.
The question above wants to analyze your knowledge about the Magna Carta and your writing skill. For that reason, I'm going to show you how to write this essay.
First, you need to choose a person type from the types presented in the question. You can choose the peasant, because the social problems of the peasants are easier to identify, just as it is easy to identify their representation in the Magna Carta.
Then you should research the Magna Carta, the life of a peasant in medieval times, and how the magma letter impacted peasants positively and negatively.
After this research, you should reflect, from a peasant's point of view, whether you agree or disagree with the statements presented in the question.
Based on all this, you can write your essay.
<h3>Steps to write an essay:</h3>
- Introduction: Briefly introduce what the Magna Carta is and whether or not you agree with the information presented in the question, taking into account the person you have chosen.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. In the first, show the information that makes you agree or not with the statement in the Magna Carta. In the second paragraph, show how the magma letter addresses the socioeconomic problems of the person you chose.
- Conclusion: Summarize all your information and reinforce your opinion about the Magna Carta.
More information about the Magna Carta is in the link:
brainly.com/question/572543
I- uhh- sure, okay.
yeah
that totally isn't photoshopped
Answer:
C)In a parliamentary democracy, the head of the government is elected by the legislature.
Explanation:
The main difference between presidential and parliamentary governmental systems is that in a parliamentary system the chief executive is chosen by the legistrature. but best describes how a parliamentary democracy differs from a presidential democracy is that the head of the government is a member of legislature.
