I'll start with the second question - it's definitely Yugoslavia. Right now there is a talk about what Hilary Clinton did in Bosnia - it was during this time- this is just one way in which you can remember this. I was mostly the ethnic clensing of Bosnians by the Serbians.
Now, the first question. Let's look at the options:
A. Too much regulation would attract illegal immigrants.
-no, there is no reason why it would attract immigrants
B. Environmental laws didn't work lo clean the environment.
-that's not true- they most often do
C. Too much regulation would clean the water.
yes, but that's a good thing!
D. Too much regulation could hurt businesses
-this is the correct answer. It's an actual criticism that is often found.
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
His passion for states' rights resulted in constrained presidential power.
Explanation:
It is on record that George Washington disliked partisanship and political parties.
It is also on record that he was one of those presidents who never saw the presidency as an opportunity to enrich himself, and when issues relating to corruption arose, he was impartial even when his friends were involved.
Regardless of his failings in the area of slavery, this disposition created for him, a brand as one of the US presidents in history to show the most restraint, judiciousness, and nonpartisan position.
He is to date seen as a great president who could have taken advantage of his position to become even more powerful but put all of that aside for the common good.
Cheers
I would say a good adjective to describe Thomas Jefferson would be intelligent.
