Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
The answer is a because it stands for communication
According to Sporre, it was during the 18th century that a differentiation between fine art and applied art began to take shape.
This distinction can be traced back to philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau who argued that there is an inherent difference in talent between artists who paint landscapes versus those who create portraits or figure sketches.
<h3>When was the separation of the fine and applied arts encouraged?</h3>
In the 18th century, Sporre argues that the values of an era encouraged the division of fine and applied arts.
He states that during this time period, people were more interested in practical applications than artistically-oriented endeavors.
This was due to advances made in science and technology, which allowed for things like machines, weapons, transportation systems etc to be developed and manufactured.
As a result of this emphasis on practicality, art became less important as it did not immediately have utilitarian value.
Taking account of both aesthetic and functional aspects simultaneously became something considered innovative or even daring which set the scene for later developments within the fine arts such as symbolism and abstractionism.
To learn more about applied and fine arts, visit:
brainly.com/question/14339622
#SPJ4
the answer is the D) since it might happen that the country is in the middle of a big disaster and it is receiving hep and the gross domestic product is reflecting this help which doesn't mean that the economy of that country is healthy.
