Answer:
C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
Explanation:
A is incorrect because it technically did not ever place a "ban" on specific races being able to move into suburbs, all it did was segregate whites and blacks in schools, public places, etc.
B is incorrect because minority groups were often discriminated against pay wise and job eligibility wise, so it would not make sense that they would be the only ones that could afford housing in suburbs.
C is correct because white families were the only "group" that could afford the housing because they were least discriminated against in a work environment back in the 1960s.
D is incorrect because it just doesn't make sense, I do not believe the government has any housing financial aid in the 1960s in general.
Hopefully this helps!
<span>Duverger's Law notes that two-party systems will tend to form when the voting style is a winner-take-all majority system. When there is a proportional representation system in place (such as in many parliaments), there will tend to be multi-party representation. Third-party candidates tend to be shut out in plurality/majority single-member electoral districts.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
August 29, 1786 and its significance were the series of violent attacks on government properties along with courthouses -- it ended with a full military confrontation in 1787.
I think b makes the most sense. The press would have most likely helped many Protestants share their works easier, such as Martin Luther with the 95 theses.
