First and Last one
They did believe their culture was superior, that's obvious. During this they also got lots of benefits from the colonies.
Answer:
I'LL ASK SANTA TO TAKE ME IN HIS SLEDGE DIRECT TO NEW YORK BECAUSE I WOULD LOVE TO BE THERE, AND IF YOU LIVE IN NEW YORK LET ME TELL YOU TO HAVE A LOT OF LUCK NOT TO LIVE IN LATIN AMERICA
Explanation:
I lie AGUANTE ARGENTINAAA JSKSKSJS
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
The growth of suburbs in the United States following World War II caused <span> massive governmental expenditures on roads programs.
Population growth after World War II was a cause of expansion of cities into suburbs. The prices of homes in suburbs were more </span>affordable to middle class families, due to lower land prices and new building practices like tract housing. (The song, "Little Boxes," sang about those kinds of homes, row after row of the same sorts of construction.)<span>
With the growth of the suburbs, improvement of roadways became a priority. Highway improvement was also a priority of President Eisenhower for the sake of national security. The Federal-Aid Highway Act passed in 1956 allocated $26 billion (in 1956 dollars!) to a monumental road-building effort that created the interstate highway system.
The growth of the suburbs can be viewed as a good thing or a bad thing. It was good in that it was part of a dynamic picture of economic growth and prosperity in America. But suburban culture had the tendency to segregate white Americans in the suburbs from blacks in the cities' inner core neighborhoods, leading to racial segregation and inner city poverty issues that we're still dealing with today.</span>
Divide and Rule Policy
After 1858, the British continued to follow the policy of divide and rule by turning the princes against the people, province against province, caste against caste, group against group, and, above all, Hindus against Muslims.
