A quarter is a fourth of something. In this case a quarter is a fourth of an hour. An hour is 60 minutes, and a fourth of that is 15 minutes (60 divided by 4).
So quarter past 3 is 3:15
Truthfully speaking there is none. There are plenty of "underprivileged"
people who have risen to success based on their determination. Everyone
has equal access to information because information is free. The only
reason someone would commit a crime is if they were brought up into
believing that that was what was expected of them from society due to
their geographical location, income, color, religion, etc. Those who are
determined to push past the narrative prove that "unequal access to
basic services" and crime are not directly related. Anyone who tells you
otherwise wishes you to remain a slave to the system because they
believe that being poor is where you belong and where you should stay.
Answer:
Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
Hope this helps
A glass bottle would sink instead of floating if there was no air inside of it
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
