Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
One...... I know is D
Two...... is B
The correct answer is B) Pouncing on the toy, the cat batted it around the room. Hope this helps.
Answer:
3) Radioactive material in the Garigliano River (made) underwater searches there dangerous. - past
4) Many students of archaeology (will have) completed an archaeological dig by graduation. - future perfect
5) I am happy __ Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa - To have viewed
6) Da Vinci was one of the most interesting artists __ during the Italian Renaissance. - to have lived
hope this helps
Explanation:
Have two sides to the story. for example you need an argument and a counter argument. so if you're opposing a situation then you need a basis and side of the story that expresses why you have this opposition and then another side that explains why you can see not to oppose what in fact you're opposing. So... If you were to write about abortion. weather or not you agree on t okay? so lets say you dont agree with it. ..Start with a good thesis statement or a question or even a quote. (i Like quotes to start) and then go into why you believe that you do not agree with it. give factual evidence that you found that makes you believe in your argument that it shouldn't be allowed. and then when it comes to finishing the assay. Explain after you explain why you dont believe in it.. then explain why you believe others may think abortion should be legal and exist and that it is okay and then for your conclusion restate your thesis and your final statement. "So this is why i believe abortion should be illegal" You have to give two sides to the paper for someone to be pursued-ed with your argument and to agree with you.
