The flaw that is shown in the local newspaper article on the herbal supplement has the flaw of B. Correlational data used to suggest causation.
<h3>Why does correlation not equate to causation?</h3>
Correlation is not the same as causation and this means that just because two variables are occurring at the same time does not mean that one variable is causing the other. There could be extenuating circumstances involved.
In this case, there is no evidence that the herbal supplement is the reason why those who take it have less fatigue. There might be other factors such as those people take generally healthy food in general.
Find out more on correlation and causation at brainly.com/question/12479370
#SPJ1
<span>The question is asking us about sexual consent and gives the following information: "Sexual Harassment/Assault Response Prevention Training Assessment Assessment Questions Question #2 of 15 2. Sexual Assault is a crime defined as intentional sexual contact, characterized by use of force, physical threat or abuse of authority or when the victim does not or cannot consent. " Consent means agreement, but since people have abused this and tried to argue that the agreement was there, a convention was developed to expect explicit agreement by people who are capable of giving it (for example old enough). Therefore, the following definition defines consent correctly:
b. Words or overt acts indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual conduct at issue by a competent person.</span>
Answer:
Compares two things using “like” or “as.”
Explanation:
A simile is a figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another thing of a different kind, used to make a description more emphatic or vivid (e.g., as brave as a lion, crazy like a fox ).
The correct choice would be True.
