This might be the case due to the lack of beauty they possess. Bayous and swamps typically are dirty, and are filled with insects. Many people would find that as a low standard of beauty.
The standard for evaluating sources has been matched with their descriptions as follows:
- Trustworthiness: The issue is addressed from a balanced and fair viewpoint.
- Relevance: The text gives information related to your topic.
- Authority: The writer of the text has experience or expertise on the topic.
- Currency: The information is up-to-date.
<h3>What are the standards for evaluating sources?</h3>
The standards for evaluating sources are the benchmarks that are used to proof articles for accuracy.
Before the information contained in a material can be accepted, the content should be free from bias. It should also be relevant and come from a credible and reliable source.
Learn more about the evaluation of sources here:
brainly.com/question/11916196
#SPJ1
1.Is the author's claim objective? [Topic and Position]
2.From what perspective did the author write the text? [Style]
3.Is the information arranged according to the content, by the author'sargument or by the needs of the audience? [Organization]
4.Which of the references elicits further discussion? [Research/Sources]
5.Where is the text found? [Audience]
6.Does the text mean to persuade? [Purpose/Context]
7.Are the sources credible? [Proof/Evidence]
8.Which of the evidence carries the more weight? [Proof/Evidence]
9.How is the information arranged in the text ? [Organization]
10.What can you infer from the writer's choice of words? [Style]
