Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer:
please make the question simplify and understandable
Answer:
On February 24, the British sent the Zimmerman telegram to President Wilson, and the United States press announced its presence on March 1. The news of the Zimmerman telegram outraged the American public, and it, along with Germany's resumption of submarine attacks, prompted the United States to enter the war.
Explanation:
Government<span> programs, which help economies adjust to the </span>rapid changes<span> ... institutional adjustments that successfully </span>cope<span> with stresses related to ... The question considered here—</span>how does population<span>growth affect the direction ..... most developing countries do </span>shift<span> priorities, continuing to make substantial gains in.
</span>
