Answer:
No, Watching TV has an opportunity cost
Explanation:
Opportunity costs represent the forfeited benefits for preferring a certain option over others. It is the foregone benefits from the next best alternative.
Watching TV for two hours has an opportunity cost. By watching TV, a person has sacrificed doing other things. The two hours could have been used in other ways like working, studying, swimming, or playing. By watching TV, the person missed benefits from the other activities. The other activity that would have resulted in more benefits other than watching TV is the opportunity cost.
Answer:
net purchases = $374,400
cost of goods purchased = $391,500
Explanation:
net purchases = total purchases - purchase returns and allowances - purchase discounts = $392,500 - $11,900 - $6,200 = $374,400
cost of goods purchased = net purchases + freight in costs = $374,400 + $17,100 = $391,500
Answer:
a policy marker
Explanation:
i will like policy to nepali नीति . it is very good marker our country are very small there are nan policy. so we consurb good governance to come fast and fast
Answer:
Attractive nuisance doctrine
Explanation:
Under attractive nuisance doctrine, a landowner is held responsible for the injuries or death caused to children while playing on the land owned by him. The child or children could have got attracted to the land without knowing the danger or hazards present on the land.
This comes under intentional tort that imposes responsibility on the landowner for ensuring the safety of the trespassers.
Yes different situations call for different measures