Saving endangered species is considered to be important for the environment, but is it really worth it? Saving endangered species would cost billions of dollars and strict environmental regulations. There are plenty of reasons why we should save these animals, but also many for why we shouldn't. What is the point in saving animals if we could spend our time and money stopping the spread of starvation and disease? Also, some of these animals are threats to livestock and people. However, I believe that we should save these animals because its the right thing to do. I love the natural world, nature is beautiful. Walking through a forest or swimming in an ocean on a sunny day is one of the best things that can be experienced. For a lot of these environment, we need these species to keep them going.
Answer:
Sandy clay is your answer
Explanation:
Answer:
As the generations are increasing or gets much over time, we have a more likelihood of seeing a response to natural selections as the favourable alleles are going to be moved from one generation to the next while those that are not favourable would be eliminated over generations.
If the new host gives allowance for early reproduction and ease of access then the generations each year would rise.
Answer:
Both have many layers of membranes
Explanation:
