Which statement explains why support for white supremacist groups increased during the 1920s?

2 answers:

8 0

Answer: I think you want to know whether the statement in the question is true or false. Based on this assumption i am answering the question and hope that it comes to your help. It would be false to say that during his administration, James Madison prevented the National Bank from going out of business. He did not oppose the bank either.

Explanation:

marin [14]4 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The support for the white supremacist groups increased during the 1920s because wartime propaganda increased suspicion of people perceived as lacking in patriotism.

Explanation:

All the war propaganda during the 1920s was loaded with lots of patriotism and demanded citizens to respect and defend who they were as society, this opens the door to the supremacist groups exposing their point of view as a way to be patriotic and to keep their nation clean and free, the propaganda didn't only punish political opinions but also genetic heritage.

You might be interested in

How did the British gain control over bengal

mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

They tried to reduce Bengalis to a minority in Bengal itself by partitioning it.

3 0

3 years ago

What modern European nation began to arise due to the congress of Vienna

Triss [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

8. In which of the following countries are Shia Muslims the majority?

maksim [4K]

The Shia are majority in Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, and Azerbaijan
So the answer is D. Iran

3 0

3 years ago

How did supporters view the storming of the bastille

qaws [65]

For them Bastille was the symbol of Monarchists tyranny.
Those who were opposing the king were locked there, so releasing them would mean that the King lost power over his subjects. Moreover, those who suffered from Kings injustice are likely to become leaders of antimonarchists movement, as their devotion to the cause is unquestionable.

3 0

4 years ago

The historian Procopius attributes this speech to Theodora. She supposedly said it to Justinian when he wanted to flee from the

mezya [45]

The answer is <span>It is shameful for an emperor to flee the rioters.

It is dishonorable for a ruler to escape the agitators. Ruler Theodora's part amid the Iconoclastic Controversy is the point at which she reestablished the utilization of symbols after her significant other's passing. She evidently said it to Justinian when he needed to escape from the Nika Riots.
</span>

6 0

3 years ago