Ummm She’s trumps wife yeah idk what kind of question is this for lol
Though both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both
worked on the goal of helping blacks in their struggle for civil rights in the United States in the 1960s,
their approach and speech was very different.
Martin was more conciliatory in his approach. He used peaceful methods and often
incorporated the teachings of the Bible.
He wanted blacks and whites to coexist with each other. Malcolm on the other hand, was very
aggressive in his approach. He was not
afraid to lash out at what he viewed was the unfair treatment that blacks were
given and encourage violent means to achieve that goal.
Answer:
the League of Nations
Explanation:
After the World War I ended, the League of Nations was formed. Lot of nations became members of it, but not the United States. The United States felt that joining the League of Nations was not in its best interest, especially considering the fact that they wanted to further expand in the Pacific, nor were they willing to give up on the territories they recently gained and controlled. This changed after the World War II though, when the League of Nations became the United Nations, and the United States had different interests and were one of the first nations to join in.
Historians Dated the fall of Rome when <span>Odoacer took control. </span>
<span>The narrator recognizes that
war is cruel, unjust, and inescapable. </span>
<span>The narrator asserts that walking away
from war would only mean war would follow you home and attack your home.
Earnest Hemingway served with the Red Cross during World War I and was injured
by Austrian mortar fire while carrying out his duties. After World War I, he
served as a war correspondent for other conflicts that broke out in Europe. His
grandson said of his reporting on war that Hemingway "told the public
about every facet of the war--especially, and most important, its effects on
the common man, woman, and child." Hemingway's book, </span><em>Farewell to Arms</em>, was
written in that way also, not glorifying war but dealing with its realities.
That's the sort of tone revealed by the narrator in the passage quoted here
also.
