1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solniwko [45]
3 years ago
7

What IS The MAin Reason That Rosa Was Arrested??

History
2 answers:
olganol [36]3 years ago
8 0
A. Not giving up her seat to a white male passenger
sesenic [268]3 years ago
4 0
Hey there!

Your answer is:

Not giving up her seat.

Hope this helps
Have a great day (:
You might be interested in
How were religion and politics related in the Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies
igomit [66]
The king, who is of highest power on earth, was look at as a god. I hope this helps some what
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following countries signed the NAFTA, resulting in the formation of the largest trading association in the world? C
ANEK [815]
Canada, Mexico, and the US.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plzzzz help me<br> Explain why a market or mixed economy is the best match for the United States.
professor190 [17]

The basic idea of the mixed economy is that the means of production are mainly under private ownership; that markets remain the dominant form of economic coordination; and that profit-seeking enterprises and the accumulation of capital remain the fundamental driving force behind economic activity.Governments in mixed economies often provide environmental protection, maintenance of employment standards, a standardized welfare system, and maintenance of competition.Also because our economic system is capitalism.

So just put all those together. Government limited control , we have capitalist economic system & that s why it s best match for the U.S.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Constitution allow Slavery?<br><br> Please answer ASAP!!!
mars1129 [50]

Question- Why did the Constitution allow Slavery?

Answer- On Monday, Senator Bernie Sanders told his audience at Liberty University that the United States “in many ways was created” as a nation “from way back on racist principles.” Not everyone agreed. The historian Sean Wilentz took to The New York Times to write that Bernie Sanders—and a lot of his colleagues—have it all wrong about the founding of the United States. The Constitution that protected slavery for three generations, until a devastating war and a constitutional amendment changed the game, was actually antislavery because it didn’t explicitly recognize “property in humans.” Lincoln certainly said so, and cited the same passage from Madison’s notes that Wilentz used. But does that make it so? And does it gainsay Sanders’s inelegant but apparently necessary voicing of what ought to be obvious, what David Brion Davis, Wilentz’s scholarly mentor and my own, wrote back in 1966—that the nation was “in many ways” founded on racial slavery? If the absence of an ironclad guarantee of a right to property in men really “quashed” the slaveholders, it should be apparent in the rest of the document, by which the nation was actually governed. But of the 11 clauses in the Constitution that deal with or have policy implications for slavery, 10 protect slave property and the powers of masters. Only one, the international slave-trade clause, points to a possible future power by which, after 20 years, slavery might be curtailed—and it didn’t work out that way at all. The three-fifths clause, which states that three-fifths of “all other persons” (i.e. slaves) will be counted for both taxation and representation, was a major boon to the slave states. This is well known; it’s astounding to see Wilentz try to pooh-pooh it. No, it wasn’t counting five-fifths, but counting 60 percent of slaves added enormously to slave-state power in the formative years of the republic. By 1800, northern critics called this phenomenon “the slave power” and called for its repeal. With the aid of the second article of the Constitution, which numbered presidential electors by adding the number of representatives in the House to the number of senators, the three-fifths clause enabled the elections of plantation masters Jefferson in 1800 and Polk in 1844. Just as importantly, the tax liability for three-fifths of the slaves turned out to mean nothing. Sure the federal government could pass a head tax, but it almost never did. It hardly could when the taxes had to emerge from the House, where the South was 60 percent overrepresented. So the South gained political power, without having to surrender much of anything in exchange. Indeed, all the powers delegated to the House—that is, the most democratic aspects of the Constitution—were disproportionately affected by what critics quickly came to call “slave representation.” These included the commerce clause—a compromise measure that gave the federal government power to regulate commerce, but only at the price of giving disproportionate power to slave states. And as if that wasn’t enough, Congress was forbidden from passing export duties—at a time when most of the value of what the U.S. exported lay in slave-grown commodities. This was one of the few things (in addition to regulating the slave trade for 20 years) that Congress was forbidden to do. Slavery and democracy in the U.S. were joined at the 60-percent-replaced hip. Another clause in Article I allowed Congress to mobilize “the Militia” to “suppress insurrections”—again, the House with its disproportionate votes would decide whether a slave rebellion counted as an insurrection. Wilentz repeats the old saw that with the rise of the northwest, the slave power’s real bastion was the Senate. Hence the battles over the admission of slave and free states that punctuated the path to Civil War. But this reads history backwards from the 1850s, not forward from 1787.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chapel of the ark of the covenant, ethiopia
anygoal [31]

The Ethiopian Orthodox Church affirms that the Ark of the Covenant exists in the municipality of  Axum in Ethiopia three millenniums ago and taking good care by religious guards. The guards are not allowed to go out the compound once they start to serve until they die. But they are not permitted to see the Ark.Recently the Ark was plagiarized by  Head of the Church report said.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which countries were the major powers in north america?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Thomas Paine write the pamphlet, Common Sense?
    8·2 answers
  • According to wilk and cliggett, the development of neoclassical economic theory was a key turning point in the history of econom
    12·1 answer
  • What did political machines want in exchange for their help
    6·1 answer
  • Why did general sherman adopt the policy of total war in his infamous march to the sea?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the political effects of the Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court decision?
    7·1 answer
  • What doctrine arose from cases in england in which parties, who had contracted for rooms along a parade route for the king's cor
    11·1 answer
  • ECONOMICS A P E X
    9·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about the federal individual income tax?
    10·2 answers
  • Which leader of the Hebrew people have them the ten commandments
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!