All categories

3 years ago

Describe five features of non democratic Pakistan under general Musharraf

1 answer:

7 0

Heya ! ..
ur answer is here>

▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶
1.In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup and overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the ‘Chief Executive’ of the country.
2. Later he conducted a referendum which was based on malpractices and fraud. He changed his designation as President in 2002.
3 In August 2002 he issued a ‘Legal Framework Order’ that amended the constitution of Pakistan. According to this Order, the President can dismiss the national or provincial assemblies.
4. The work of the civilian cabinet is supervised by a National Security Council which is dominated by military officers.
5. After passing this law, elected representatives have some powers but the final power rests with military officers and General Musharraf himself. Because of these reasons Pakistan under General Musharraf should not be called a democracy.
⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪hope helped ! ..

You might be interested in

_______________ distinctions operate in virtually every aspect of our lives, determining the nature of our work, the quality of

Tcecarenko [31]

<span>__________class_____ distinctions operate in virtually every aspect of our lives, determining the nature of our work, the quality of our schooling, and the health and safety of our loved ones.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Working in own country is better than foreign employment... write an essay.... please help me..

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer

Currently, many people like going to different countries for working and living. It leads to that there are many positive and negative effects while people live and work in vary foreign country. Some main effects will be discussed in this essay.

The first advantage is salary because people are really need money to support their live. Some Vietnamese people, for instance, they like to move to US or Australia for living and working because they think they will get the higher income than in Vietnam and enjoy the standard life.

Furthermore, people who want to travel are the poor people and live in the developing country. They may improve their current life and work in the new environment to get more experience. Finally, working and living in a foreign country may have some good benefit by the government after people retire.

On the other hand, working and living in a foreign country may bring some disadvantages.

Traditional culture is the first disadvantage. It is really hard to live in a country which has a lot different culture. In UK, for example, the state food is very difficult to eat and the cost is very expensive. Next, people will be got homesick because their families are so far from them. Lastly, it is very dangerous when people go abroad for working and living because they do not understand about the new environment that they have to adapt quickly for the short period of time such as the new neighbors or the new law of the area.

In short, people should think clearly about this problem. It effect not only on their future life but also their family and the government. They should chose the best advantage for their own business.

Revised

Currently, many people like going to different countries for working and living. It This leads to that there are many positive and negative effects while which people experience when live living and working in vary a foreign country. Some of these main effects will be discussed in this essay.

The first advantage is salary because people are really need money to support their lives. Some Vietnamese people, for instance, they like to move to the US or Australia for living and working

because they think they will get the a higher income than in Vietnam and enjoy the a higher standard of life. Furthermore, the people who want to travel are the poor people and who live in the developing countriesy. They may can improve their current life and by working in the a new environment to get more experience. Finally, working and living in a foreign country may have some good benefits by for the government after people retire. On the other hand, working and living in a foreign country may bring some disadvantages. Missing your tTraditional culture is the first disadvantage.

It is really hard to live in a country which has a lot very different culture. In the UK, for example, the state local food is very difficult to eat and the cost is very expensive. Next, people will be got get homesick because their families are so far from them. Lastly, it is very dangerous when people go abroad for working and living because they do not understand about the new environment that and they have to adapt quickly for thein a short period of time to things such as the new neighbors or the new laws of the area.

In short, people should think clearly about this problem. It effects not only on their future life but also their family and the government. They should choose the best advantage for their own business.

Good job with organization and content. Take care with sentence structure and be sure to proofread more carefully.

I hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement is accurate about native Americans and the American revolution

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

The statement that is most accurate of those listed is Option D. Regardless of which side they chose, Native Americans lost land during the war.

Explanation:

Before the American Revolution, the expansion of the 13 colonies westward was controlled to some extent by the British Crown. There were laws in place meant to protect Native American lands west of the Appalachian mountains after the British won the lands from the French and Indian war (also known as the Seven Years War, from 1754-1763). During the American Revolution, there were Native American groups that supported the British and others that supported the Patriots. However, after the war, the new United States government continued its expansion westward and the Native American groups definitively lost land.

7 0

3 years ago

Stacy has a difficult time answering the question "Should parents increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their childr

GuDViN [60]

Answer:

double-barreled question

Explanation:

A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.

For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.

6 0

3 years ago

1.2 Explain FOUR contributory factors to the safety and security problem locally<br> and globally.

Arturiano [62]

Answer:

ese factor om oooooomunc

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago