He opposed this compromise, as it would ban slavery in new states, and he believed that slavery should be allowed in all states and that this compromise was intervening into the South's affairs, which the south should decide by itself.
The answer is <span>charge bargaining
This type of bargain is usually being made if a defendant posess a certain information that wanted by the prosecutor, so they made a deal that beneficial for both of them.
For example, a drug seller that exchange the reduction of his sentence with information regarding his drug supplier.</span>
Hey! Thanks for using Brainly.
I think it would be communication. As said before, they contacted one family about the schools. To get even more information contacting others would be even better.
Have an amazing day.
The Appointments Clause [of Article II] clearly implies a power of the Senate to give advice on and, if it chooses to do so, to consent to a nomination, but it says nothing about how the Senate should go about exercising that power. The text of the Constitution thus leaves the Senate free to exercise that power however it sees fit. Throughout American history, the Senate has frequently – surely, thousands of times – exercised its power over nominations by declining to act on them.
